16.10.2023 - Studies
It is difficult to prepare for the death of a loved one. Whether unexpectedly or at the end of a long illness, saying goodbye to a loved one triggers grief. If the bereavement is linked to an inheritance, there may also be feelings of guilt due to the new wealth that has been gained but not earned. It is difficult to make well-considered decisions in such an exceptional situation.
Heirs and bequeathers should therefore seek an exchange on the transfer of assets at an early stage. A dialogue illuminates expectations, prevents a feeling of ignorance and excessive demands on the part of the heirs and helps testators to know that their legacy is in good hands. In this way, inheritance does not remain a singular event, but becomes a process.
In Germany, around 600,000 intergenerational inheritances take place each year. One third each is accounted for by assets under 25,000 euros, between 25,000 and 150,000 thousand euros and more than 150,000 euros. Since every third euro inherited is accounted for by the two percent largest inheritances, an average of around 180,000 euros is bequeathed to the individual heir.1
The use here differs from other one-off payments such as lottery winnings. The savings rates are significantly higher. This is because the feelings of guilt already mentioned inhibit a purely consumption-oriented approach to the inheritance. Consumption shame after a bereavement, postponing the decision on the use or also a "washing clean" of the inheritance through "sensible" use are expressions of this behaviour.2
Feelings of guilt thus protect the individual from overly wasteful consumption. However, acting in a permanently passive manner and based solely on moral justification can hardly be satisfying in the long term. The long-term goal of an heir should be to overcome his or her own feelings of guilt and to deal with the inheritance in a (self-)conscious way.
The source of the guilt triggered in heirs is aptly described by the American social scientist Paul G. Schervish:
"The great American sin is having advantage without earning it."3
In addition to the "sin" of not gaining an advantage for oneself, the loss of a loved one must be dealt with at the same time. To deal with both, heirs go through six stages in succession, according to author Ann Perry. These are closely related to psychiatrist Elizabeth Kuebler-Ross' five stages of grief:4
An heir's goal should always be to leave grief and guilt behind and reach the stage where he or she feels worthy of the inheritance. Once there, one has developed a healthy relationship to one's new living conditions and looks optimistically to the future. One has emancipated oneself from the "sin" of not earning one's own wealth.
The greatest concern of testators - in their view - is the existing deficits of the heirs in dealing responsibly with the estate. According to a Bank of America survey of high net worth individuals5, only four out of ten parents trust their children to handle the family assets responsibly. They are even less convinced of their grandchildren. Only one in five trust their grandchildren to handle their assets well.6
In principle, people deal very sensibly with inheritances.7 However, insofar as a business is inherited, the fear of the testators cannot be dismissed: A study on American family businesses from 1987 shows that only 30 percent of the businesses survive the second generation and only 13 percent the third generation of the owner families. In the fourth, the figure is only 3 percent.8 The main reason cited is a lack of planning. This explicitly includes a lack of strategy for handing over the business to the next generation. It fits the picture that preserving the status quo is seen in other studies as one of the reasons for failure of family businesses.9 The above-mentioned paralysis, which ensures the preservation of assets in the case of real estate or cash inheritances, often leads to a standstill when a business is taken over, which threatens the existence of the business.
Other reasons for the failure of generational transition are that family relationships make doing business difficult and that the pool of leadership talent is limited to the family circle. Both are valid individual arguments in their own right. However, they could also be attributed to a lack of communication between the generations. It fits in with this that only 64 percent of respondents in 2016 stated that they had talked to their descendants about their wealth situation.10
Despite all concerns, leaving an inheritance remains important for three out of four respondents in their seventies (Silent Generation)11. They plan to leave 8.5 out of ten dollars to their families.
Two examples show how differently one can organise the transfer of wealth to the next generation: Bernard Arnault, the majority owner of the luxury goods group LVHM, took his daughter Delphine with him when he visited shops of his Dior brand at the age of 10. Today, all five children work in different positions in the company. Even if the father never forced the children to join the company, today's situation is probably largely due to his influence. Or as his son Frédéric says:
"He found a way to make me want to give my life to the family business like he did."12
Investor Warren Buffett has a different approach for his children:
"I've seen people try to steer their children, and the worst thing you could do is use money to induce given behaviour with kids,"13
And further:
"I told my kids they don't have to do anything ... finish college, become doctors or lawyers. ... I told them to use their talents in whatever form they think will create the greatest net benefit to society."14
As a consequence, one son is a musician and author and the other a farmer. His daughter works mainly as a philanthropist. At the same time, he does not intend to pass on his entire fortune to his children:
"You should leave your children enough so they can do anything, but not enough so they can do nothing".15
He wants to leave the rest of his fortune to Bill Gates' foundation, which is also known to his children.
These two quite different concepts have two things in common: Firstly, the open confrontation with one's own financial situation and secondly, the passing on of values, i.e. an inheritance that goes beyond the financial.
Advisors on estate planning support this behaviour.16 For all those who have something to bequeath and all those who expect an inheritance, the following applies: talk to each other early on. Inheritance should be a process and not a singular event. This creates clarity about the thoughts, motives and possible wishes of the bequeather. The feeling of guilt on the part of the heirs is reduced. The inheritance does not come to them out of the blue and they are clear about the intentions involved.
As we have seen, it is advisable to discuss mutual expectations in good time. For the day when you really are the heir, there are recognised rules of conduct among experts:
An inheritance is a one-time event. Inheritance, however, ideally begins long before the day of the inheritance. The more unprepared we are for an inheritance, the greater the risk of falling into a state of shock and being overcome by feelings of guilt. One should therefore talk about the (intergenerational) transfer of assets early on.
Testators should be aware that an estate is more than just financial assets. It is connected with values and views of life. It is particularly helpful for one's own children to be aware of the ideas and expectations of their parents. It is easier to build on an understanding of the bequest. And for the parents, it gives them the reassuring feeling that they are bequeathing more than "just" money and that the legacy is in good hands.
Once the inheritance has occurred, the most important rule is "keep calm". Until you have your complex emotions under control, it is best not to make any fundamental decisions. Doubtful investments or large donations in particular are quickly made and even more quickly regretted. In addition to the assets, this also includes one's own life circumstances such as place of residence and professional activity.
1 Deutsches Institut für Altersvorsorge: Analyse Erben in Deutschland 2015-24 and Flossbach von Storch Research Institut: Plötzlich vermögend - und dann?
2 Flossbach von Storch Research Institut: Suddenly wealthy - and then?
3 Ann Perry: The Wise Inheritor, Crown Currency, 2003; page 98.
4 Ann Perry: The Wise Inheritor, Crown Currency, 2003 and Elizabeth Kübler-Ross: On Death and Dying, Simon & Schuster, 1969.
5 More than $3 million in investable assets (primary residence not included)
6 U.S. Trust Bank of America Private Wealth Management: 2017 U.S. Trust Insights on Wealth and Worth
7 Flossbach von Storch Research Institut: Suddenly wealthy - and then?
8 John L. Ward: Keeping the Family Business Healthy, Springer, 2011.
9 Thomas Zellweger et al.: From Longevity of Firms to Transgenerational Entrepreneurship of Families: Introducing Family Entrepreneurial Orientation
10 Poor little rich kids: Most kids from wealthy families squander their inheritance | Toronto Sun
11 Over 70 years of age at the time of the survey - cohorts up to 1945
13 Warren Buffett's Advice On How To Raise Well-Adjusted Heirs (forbes.com)
14 Warren Buffett's Advice On How To Raise Well-Adjusted Heirs (forbes.com)
15 Warren Buffett's Advice On How To Raise Well-Adjusted Heirs (forbes.com)
16 See e.g. Ann Perry: The Wise Inheritor, Crown Currency, 2003 or Considerations for Family Legacy Planning | U.S. Bank (usbank.com).
Legal notice
The information contained and opinions expressed in this document reflect the views of the author at the time of publication and are subject to change without prior notice. Forward-looking statements reflect the judgement and future expectations of the author. The opinions and expectations found in this document may differ from estimations found in other documents of Flossbach von Storch AG. The above information is provided for informational purposes only and without any obligation, whether contractual or otherwise. This document does not constitute an offer to sell, purchase or subscribe to securities or other assets. The information and estimates contained herein do not constitute investment advice or any other form of recommendation. All information has been compiled with care. However, no guarantee is given as to the accuracy and completeness of information and no liability is accepted. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All authorial rights and other rights, titles and claims (including copyrights, brands, patents, intellectual property rights and other rights) to, for and from all the information in this publication are subject, without restriction, to the applicable provisions and property rights of the registered owners. You do not acquire any rights to the contents. Copyright for contents created and published by Flossbach von Storch AG remains solely with Flossbach von Storch AG. Such content may not be reproduced or used in full or in part without the written approval of Flossbach von Storch AG.
Reprinting or making the content publicly available – in particular by including it in third-party websites – together with reproduction on data storage devices of any kind requires the prior written consent of Flossbach von Storch AG.
© 2024 Flossbach von Storch. All rights reserved.